| Modifier and Type | Field and Description |
|---|---|
| private final DomainResult |
| Access | Constructor and Description |
|---|---|
| public | SelectEagerCollectionFetch(NavigablePath fetchedPath, PluralAttributeMapping fetchedAttribute, DomainResult<?> collectionKeyDomainResult, FetchParent fetchParent)
|
| Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
|---|---|
| public DomainResultAssembler | createAssembler(FetchParentAccess parentAccess, AssemblerCreationState creationState)
Implements org. |
| public JavaType | |
| public FetchTiming | |
| public boolean | hasTableGroup()
Implements org. |
| collectionKeyDomainResult | back to summary |
|---|---|
| private final DomainResult<?> collectionKeyDomainResult | |
| SelectEagerCollectionFetch | back to summary |
|---|---|
| public SelectEagerCollectionFetch(NavigablePath fetchedPath, PluralAttributeMapping fetchedAttribute, DomainResult<?> collectionKeyDomainResult, FetchParent fetchParent) | |
| createAssembler | back to summary |
|---|---|
| public DomainResultAssembler Implements org. Doc from org. Create the assembler for this fetch
| |
| getResultJavaType | back to summary |
|---|---|
| public JavaType Implements org.
| |
| getTiming | back to summary |
|---|---|
| public FetchTiming getTiming() Implements org. Doc from org. immediate or delayed? todo (6.0) : should we also expose the fetch-style? Perhaps the fetch-options?
| |
| hasTableGroup | back to summary |
|---|---|
| public boolean hasTableGroup() Implements org. Doc from org. Is the TableGroup associated with this Fetch defined?
| |